Facebook boss not charity 99% of assets as we mistook

Many experts believe that this move is simply to transfer money from "another pocket after pocket" of the founder of Facebook only

Many experts believe that this move is simply to transfer money from "another pocket after pocket" of the founder of Facebook only.
 
 
Unlike some other billionaire was established nonprofit charities, the couple claimed Zuckerberg build a limited liability company (LLC) in order to implement the investment project.
 
With this move, the amount of 45 billion Zuckerberg is not only profitable, but also for the family reputation. However, many experts viewed it simply as the transfer of money from "another pocket after pocket" of the founder of Facebook.
 
The Company's limited liability Zuckerberg may invest in active funds non-profit society, or paying for campaign funds, investors lobbying for laws.
 
In other words, billionaire Zuckerberg can do anything with this money without being limited array of charities.
 
Although this is normal behavior in the US, but with some other cultures, it can not be called donations or charities established.
 
Besides, the decision of Facebook's executives to avoid problems relating to US law. By law, a charitable foundation with its own regulations and by the competent authorities to monitor.
 
Every year, charities will have to explain his assets before regulators. Meanwhile, a limited liability company by Zuckerberg is not restricted by these regulations.
 
If Zuckerberg's company LLC to issue shares, pay taxes would be very high. However, if this company philanthropy will be tax deductible. Even if Zuckerberg stock enterprise use this for charity, it almost certainly will not have to pay tax.
 
Closely with the tax system in the US, usually the billionaire would contribute to charity or to propaganda promoting the image, thereby easily convince the tax authorities over the implementation of tax obligations.
 
According to the New York Times, the billionaire Zuckerberg moves not only bring freedom to the founders decided that limited the attention of tax authorities.